A shape analysis approach to prediction of bone stiffness using FEXI

The preferred method of assessing the risk of an osteoporosis related fracture is currently a measure of bone mineral density (BMD) by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, other factors contribute to the overall risk of fracture, including anatomical geometry and the spatial distribution of bone. Finite element analysis can be performed in both two and three dimensions, and predicts the deformation or induced stress when a load is applied to a structure (such as a bone) of defined material composition and shape. The simulation of a mechanical compression test provides a measure of whole bone stiffness (N mm−1). A simulation system was developed to study the sensitivity of BMD, 3D and 2D finite element analysis to variations in geometric parameters of a virtual proximal femur model. This study demonstrated that 3D FE and 2D FE (FEXI) were significantly more sensitive to the anatomical shape and composition of the proximal femur than conventional BMD. The simulation approach helped to analyse and understand how variations in geometric parameters affect the stiffness and hence strength of a bone susceptible to osteoporotic fracture. Originally, the FEXI technique modelled the femur as a thin plate model of an assumed constant depth for finite element analysis (FEA). A better prediction of tissue depth across the bone, based on its geometry, was required to provide a more accurate model for FEA. A shape template was developed for the proximal femur to provide this information for the 3D FE analysis. Geometric morphometric techniques were used to procure and analyse shape information from a set of CT scans of excised human femora. Generalized Procrustes Analysis and Thin Plate Splines were employed to analyse the data and generate a shape template for the proximal femur. 2D Offset and Depth maps generated from the training set data were then combined to model the three-dimensional shape of the bone. The template was used to predict the three-dimensional bone shape from a 2D image of the proximal femur procured through a DXA scan. The error in the predicted 3D shape was measured as the difference in predicted and actual depths at each pixel. The mean error in predicted depths was found to be 1.7mm compared to an average bone depth of 34mm. 3D FEXI analysis on the predicted 3D bone along with 2D FEXI for a stance loading condition and BMD measurement were performed based on 2D radiographic projections of the CT scans and compared to bone stiffness results obtained from finite element analysis of the original 3D CT scans. 3D FEXI provided a significantly higher correlation (R2 = 0.85) with conventional CT derived 3D finite element analysis than achieved with both BMD (R2 = 0.52) and 2D FEXI (R2 = 0.44)

Comparison of 3D finite element analysis derived stiffness and BMD to determine the failure load of the excised proximal femur

Introduction: Bone mineral density (BMD) is currently the preferred surrogate for bone strength in clinical practice. Finite element analysis (FEA) is a computer simulation technique that can predict the deformation of a structure when a load is applied, providing a measure of stiffness (Nmm−1). Finite element analysis of X-ray images (3D-FEXI) is a FEA technique whose analysis is derived froma single 2D radiographic image. Methods: 18 excised human femora had previously been quantitative computed tomography scanned, from which 2D BMD-equivalent radiographic images were derived, and mechanically tested to failure in a stance-loading configuration. A 3D proximal femur shape was generated from each 2D radiographic image and used to construct 3D-FEA models. Results: The coefficient of determination (R2%) to predict failure load was 54.5% for BMD and 80.4% for 3D-FEXI. Conclusions: This ex vivo study demonstrates that 3D-FEXI derived from a conventional 2D radiographic image has the potential to significantly increase the accuracy of failure load assessment of the proximal femur compared with that currently achieved with BMD. This approach may be readily extended to routine clinical BMD images derived by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Crown Copyright © 2009 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of IPEM. All rights reserve

A shape analysis approach to prediction of bone stiffness using FEXI

The preferred method of assessing the risk of an osteoporosis related fracture is currently a measure of bone mineral density (BMD) by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, other factors contribute to the overall risk of fracture, including anatomical geometry and the spatial distribution of bone. Finite element analysis can be performed in both two and three dimensions, and predicts the deformation or induced stress when a load is applied to a structure (such as a bone) of defined material composition and shape. The simulation of a mechanical compression test provides a measure of whole bone stiffness (N mm−1). A simulation system was developed to study the sensitivity of BMD, 3D and 2D finite element analysis to variations in geometric parameters of a virtual proximal femur model. This study demonstrated that 3D FE and 2D FE (FEXI) were significantly more sensitive to the anatomical shape and composition of the proximal femur than conventional BMD. The simulation approach helped to analyse and understand how variations in geometric parameters affect the stiffness and hence strength of a bone susceptible to osteoporotic fracture. Originally, the FEXI technique modelled the femur as a thin plate model of an assumed constant depth for finite element analysis (FEA). A better prediction of tissue depth across the bone, based on its geometry, was required to provide a more accurate model for FEA. A shape template was developed for the proximal femur to provide this information for the 3D FE analysis. Geometric morphometric techniques were used to procure and analyse shape information from a set of CT scans of excised human femora. Generalized Procrustes Analysis and Thin Plate Splines were employed to analyse the data and generate a shape template for the proximal femur. 2D Offset and Depth maps generated from the training set data were then combined to model the three-dimensional shape of the bone. The template was used to predict the three-dimensional bone shape from a 2D image of the proximal femur procured through a DXA scan. The error in the predicted 3D shape was measured as the difference in predicted and actual depths at each pixel. The mean error in predicted depths was found to be 1.7mm compared to an average bone depth of 34mm. 3D FEXI analysis on the predicted 3D bone along with 2D FEXI for a stance loading condition and BMD measurement were performed based on 2D radiographic projections of the CT scans and compared to bone stiffness results obtained from finite element analysis of the original 3D CT scans. 3D FEXI provided a significantly higher correlation (R2 = 0.85) with conventional CT derived 3D finite element analysis than achieved with both BMD (R2 = 0.52) and 2D FEXI (R2 = 0.44).EThOS - Electronic Theses Online ServiceGBUnited Kingdo